We, at Sacred Heart Immigration Law, have recently implemented a significant policy change regarding asylum cases

We, at Sacred Heart Immigration Law, have recently implemented a significant policy change regarding asylum cases. We have stipulated that we will no longer accept asylum cases without an I-94 on a probationary basis or otherwise. This decision reflects our nuanced understanding of the complexities surrounding immigration law and asylum processes.

Firstly, it's crucial to clarify what an I-94 is and its relevance to asylum cases. An I-94 is a document issued by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to foreign visitors upon entry to the United States. It contains crucial information such as the date of entry, the authorized period of stay, and the visa classification. In the context of asylum cases, having an I-94 generally indicates that an individual has been admitted into the United States through legal channels, which can significantly impact their eligibility for asylum.

Currently, our firm is inundated with humanitarian asylum cases of individuals who have been thoroughly screened for eligibility. These cases require significant resources and attention to detail to navigate the complex legal landscape surrounding asylum claims.

A key distinction in immigration law is between individuals who enter the country without inspection (EWI - Entry Without Inspection) and those who are admitted through legal channels. EWI individuals face distinct challenges when pursuing asylum claims compared to those with admission status or parole.

Having admission status in CBP or parole significantly strengthens an asylum case. Admission status implies that the individual has undergone some level of scrutiny and evaluation by immigration authorities upon entry, which can lend credibility to their asylum claim. In contrast, EWI individuals may encounter obstacles such as the Firm Resettlement Bar, which presents a significant challenge to their asylum prospects.

The Firm Resettlement Bar is a provision in immigration law that prevents individuals from obtaining asylum if they have firmly resettled in another country before arriving in the United States. This barrier presents a formidable obstacle for EWI asylum seekers, as meeting the exceptions to this bar is exceptionally difficult, especially in the current environment of intensified immigration law enforcement and limited avenues for relief.

Furthermore, amid ongoing debates about immigration policy and the need to ensure that immigrants contribute positively to society, there is a growing emphasis on evaluating individuals' eligibility to become productive members of society without becoming a burden on government resources. Issues such as public charge considerations further complicate the asylum process, as individuals must demonstrate their ability to financially support themselves and not rely excessively on public assistance programs.

Given these complexities and the increasing demand for immigration services, our firm has made the strategic decision to focus our resources on cases with a higher likelihood of success, namely those involving individuals with admission status or parole who have a stronger basis for their asylum claims. This approach allows us to effectively allocate our resources and maximize our impact in assisting vulnerable individuals seeking asylum in the United States.